Testing is an essential part of the software development lifecycle. It ensures the elimination of bugs, addresses performance issues, and checks for expected functionalities, security, and other important aspects. The efficiency of the testing process is what determines the quality of the software application delivered to a customer, and for this reason, it is one of the most important stages of the development process.
When it comes to testing, there are two ways to go about it – manual and automated. There is often much confusion over which is the optimal method for ensuring maximum quality and minimum error with minimum effort. There is also the question of feasibility with regard to time, cost, and other available resources. So, which one should you choose?
Manual Testing
Manual testing is the conventional method of software testing undertaken by quality analysts or testers without the use of tools or scripts. The process of executing test cases and generating test reports are all carried out manually in this method. Manual testing is time-consuming, requires the constant and complete attention of one or more individuals, and, despite this, is prone to human error. It is also challenging to carry out manual testing when frequent and repetitive testing is required.
Despite these obvious drawbacks, however, manual testing is still essential to testing in certain scenarios. Field testing and “monkey testing” of apps in mobile and wearable devices cannot be automated and needs manual testing. When it comes to testing for the user-friendliness of particular software, again, the scope of automated testing is limited. Only manual testing and observed feedback from quality analysts are suited for such assessments.
Automated Testing
Automated testing, as the name suggests, involves the automated execution of pre-scripted test cases. In this method of software testing, testers employ specialized tools to write code and develop test scripts. Following this step, the tests themselves are run automatically. The actual results of the tests are also compared automatically to the expected results.
Automated testing is best suited in scenarios that repetitive testing. This is because it requires only the initial effort of developing the test cases. After this, it can simply be allowed to run, as many times as needed. Automated testing is also several times faster than manual testing.
Which one should you choose?
At CloudNow, we believe that both manual and automated testing are essential. We automate most tests that fall within the scope of automation to save time and improve accuracy. At the same time, we acknowledge the value of manual intervention when it comes to testing certain aspects of the product.
Manual testing is best suited for:
Automated testing is best suited for:
The right mix of manual and automated testing is important for optimizing the various aspects of the application while keeping in mind factors such as cost, time, and human resources. That’s why, at CloudNow, we offer testing as a service – both as a standalone service and as part of our holistic project development services.
Interested in our service? Get in touch with us today!
A report by The Uptime Institute says that each year, an average of about 20…
Google Workspace has more than 3 billion users, but there are several hidden gems in…
While cloud computing does offer financial benefits by reducing the need for physical infrastructure and…
On June 29, 2006, Google launched the Google Maps API, revolutionizing web development by giving…
2024 has been a real coming-of-age year for generative AI in mainstream applications. But many…
Over 6 million businesses use Google Workspace (GWS) today, thanks to a go-to suite…